(via The Diplomat)
Sigmar Gabriel’s demand that China follow a “One Europe” created an unusual analogy to the “One China” policy, which accepts China’s dictum that foreign nations should not entertain diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Beijing’s comments on European unity also show that it struggles to understand the European idea of subordinating sovereignty in certain areas to a community of nations.
Reviving Europe’s unity was the theme of Sigmar Gabriel’s speech in Paris. The German foreign minister‘s address at a gathering of French ambassadors was meant to remind Europeans of their joint purpose, but it ended up raising eyebrows in China, which was presented as a threat to European unity.
The German minister appealed to EU members to pursue a joint foreign policy vis-à-vis the Asian power to counter Beijing’s tactics: "If we do not succeed for example in developing a single strategy towards China, then China will succeed in dividing Europe," he said. The Chinese Foreign Ministry declared to be “shocked” by the statement.
Chinese tactics undermine consensus within EU
China has tried to draw Central and Eastern European countries into its orbit with the so-called “16+1” format. Created in 2012, this framework offers a special platform for Beijing to discuss political and economic issues with 16 states in Central and Eastern Europe without the intrusion of Western European nations. China has also been investing heavily in countries connected to its Belt and Road Initiative. Some of these countries have been less willing to criticize the People’s Republic than their Western European counterparts. This includes issues on which they had agreed to coordinate and pursue a common foreign policy in Lisbon in 2007, such as human rights and principles of international law.
In a recent case, Greece – a key destination of Chinese investments under the Belt and Road Initiative – blocked a European Union statement at the UN Human Rights Council that was critical of China’s human rights record. Gabriel mentioned another example, when some member states last year prevented the EU from taking a strong stance on China’s refusal to accept an international court ruling on its territorial claims in the South China Sea. "Some EU member states don‘t want to approve [the ruling], because they do not want to put themselves in conflict with China," Gabriel said in his address to the French ambassadors.
Beijing questions European unity
In the clearest signal to Beijing (and to some EU member states), the German foreign minister demanded that China should follow a “One Europe” policy – creating an unusual analogy with the fact that European nations abide by the “One China” policy, which accepts China’s dictum that foreign nations should not entertain diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
Beijing was not amused. “We are shocked by these statements,” said the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s spokeswoman. She dismissed the comparison to Taiwan by saying that “The EU is a regional organization composed of sovereign states, not a sovereign country itself.” And she added “We hope that he can clarify what he means by ‘one Europe’ and whether there is a consensus on ‘one Europe’ among EU members.”
The director of the Department of European Studies at the China Institute of International Studies, Cui Hongjian, took an equally harsh stance in an article for the party-state newspaper “Global Times”: “It is unreasonable that Gabriel compared the One Europe policy with the One China policy. The latter is based on historical facts and political consensus across the Taiwan Straits, and recognized by international organizations and treaties, while the One Europe policy is only an ambiguous concept.”
Whereas cross-strait political consensus is not free of controversies (Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-Wen refused to reaffirm the One China principle in her inaugural speech in May 2016), some in Europe may even agree with Cui’s characterization of the EU’s struggles to formulate common policies. But Beijing’s comments also appear to prove Gabriel’s point: that China is ambivalent about its support of EU integration and that it fails to acknowledge the legal and political principles underlying the need to form political consensus on foreign affairs among EU member states.
This article was first published in The Diplomat on September 9, 2017.